brynvr6 1 Posted May 2, 2010 Report Share Posted May 2, 2010 Here's mine Link to post Share on other sites
jims13 6 Posted May 5, 2010 Report Share Posted May 5, 2010 389 bhp and 380 lfbt trq at 17 psi.. Link to post Share on other sites
jims13 6 Posted May 5, 2010 Report Share Posted May 5, 2010 forgot the graph Link to post Share on other sites
FishWick 21 Posted May 6, 2010 Report Share Posted May 6, 2010 Very nice sir :-) Link to post Share on other sites
jims13 6 Posted May 6, 2010 Report Share Posted May 6, 2010 cheers kev, its a fair bit quicker and better to drive since we bombed it down the bypass. im hoping to bump it up to a nice 1.3 bar or 20 ish psi ... thats should see me over 400 .. im also looking to replace me wastegate as mine has some weird spring in it .. maybe 20-25 mm in dia ... ordered a 36mm and its way to big ..arse Link to post Share on other sites
FishWick 21 Posted May 6, 2010 Report Share Posted May 6, 2010 Yeah yours has come a long way since then, not that it was bad to begin with! Just noticed in your avatar you're on gearbox no 3? Seriously? Was it gunning up the strip that broke them?I'm just looking at your plot and the torque does climb very quickly, but it also drops 100lbft from 4500 to 7000. I'm just thinking if you're breaking gearboxes and looking to get your times down, maybe go to a bigger turbo? Later spool, saves the box, but stonking top end held to 7000? Just a thought :-)I've not had any probs with my gearbox yet, touch wood, but it's a road only car I guess....Good stuff mate, it's coming along nicely! Link to post Share on other sites
jims13 6 Posted May 8, 2010 Report Share Posted May 8, 2010 yeah box number 3.. tbh i do alot of sprints and track days , niether will help the box, they are also boxs with un varifyed mileage , not that i think it would help.i reallly like my turbo, but a biggerhousing does make sense.im hpoing my wastegate issue's will solve my trq problems, as in the car you cannot feel the difference.ive also got some turbo gaskets to chaneg as i have a slight blow, only small stuff but i spouse it all adds up. Link to post Share on other sites
FishWick 21 Posted May 19, 2010 Report Share Posted May 19, 2010 Ha ha, "Jim'll fix it", love it :-)I don't think I could be bothered to change the box 3 times but fair play to you mate! Have you considered an 02M conversion? Something I've been meaning to do for ages but haven't got round to it.3" exhaust next too, but I'm concerned about annoying my neighbours with the noise. Is yours 3" or 2.5"? I can't remember!I've only just achieved a completely gas tight exhaust setup after 3 years, LOL! If your leaks are pre-turbine, then you should notice a slight performance improvement and even quicker spool if you fix them!It took a new manifold, new gaskets, a resurfaced wastegate flange (it warped when welding it to the downpipe, but I didn't spot that at the time) and lots of swearing and sanding / filing to get mine leak free.... Link to post Share on other sites
jims13 6 Posted May 19, 2010 Report Share Posted May 19, 2010 yep 3" dual box system, not to loud and super quite at 70-80 mph, your more than welcome to see what you think . made in cutlery grade stainless, so it will never rust new gaskets etc are next, fingers crossed it solves my minor problems Link to post Share on other sites
FishWick 21 Posted May 21, 2010 Report Share Posted May 21, 2010 I like the Super quiet at 70-80mph bit :-)Which silencers did you use?Yeah I wouldn't mind meeting up again at some point and see how your car's progressed and listen to your exhaust! Link to post Share on other sites
jims13 6 Posted May 21, 2010 Report Share Posted May 21, 2010 silencers were sourced by matt @ c2motorsports uk . they are physically the biggest we could fit in the space we had, il grab the tape and have a measure up for you Link to post Share on other sites
FishWick 21 Posted May 21, 2010 Report Share Posted May 21, 2010 You're the second person that's told me C2 have some quiet silencers, so that could be the way to go, cheers mate. Link to post Share on other sites
cabrioman 6 Posted July 12, 2010 Report Share Posted July 12, 2010 2.9 vr6 ever mod but pistons and rods plus 50 bhp of nos 388.8 bhp and 363.8 ftlb ... Link to post Share on other sites
FishWick 21 Posted July 13, 2010 Report Share Posted July 13, 2010 Good result! Supercharged? Link to post Share on other sites
Dan34 0 Posted September 11, 2010 Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 Here's my results:Mods are:DecatScorpion cat backRam air filter186bhp aint so bad i thought for an engine thats just hit 128k on original chains and tensioners haha also its an obd2 Link to post Share on other sites
DanH 1 Posted December 5, 2010 Report Share Posted December 5, 2010 will get graph up later.... '95 obd1, 180k miles, decat, non resanated jetex system (with many blows) swiss cheesed air box, oil and coolent leaks 168.26whp184.19bhp190.35 torque Link to post Share on other sites
Rustyman 0 Posted December 5, 2010 Report Share Posted December 5, 2010 MAX POWER 168.38 BHPMAX TORQUE 188.00 FT - LBSPOWER AT CLUTCH 185.02Run conditions = 53.33 F & Humidity 41%OBD1 N/A 1995 Only modification is air filter everything else stock..Orginal chains &122k miles on the clock Link to post Share on other sites
coullstar 2 Posted December 5, 2010 Report Share Posted December 5, 2010 VR6T, 2.8, short runner, GT3582r with 1bar Link to post Share on other sites
cabrioman 6 Posted December 5, 2010 Report Share Posted December 5, 2010 Good result! Supercharged?yeah vortech v9 with 12 psi pulley ... Link to post Share on other sites
BrianHouston 0 Posted January 5, 2011 Report Share Posted January 5, 2011 New VR purchased back in Sept 2010 been itching to get on RR to see where it stands, heres the results from a Dynapack Chassis Dyno test on 4th Jan 2010 at Torquetronix, Kells N. Ireland Max Power - 165.3 HP @ 5924rpmMax Torque - 163.6 lb-ft @ 4657rpmVR6 2.8 OBD1Mk3 Golf 1994Circa 130kFullsize - K&N 57i + cold air feed to lower bumper Unknown De-cat & 2.5" Straight Through Exhaust SystemDoes anyone know what transmission losses are trypically for a VR? Have seen ~20% values used for RR or +20-40HP to get Flywheel BHP but that would be a unfair assumption as I had no tyre drag. Any Ideas? Link to post Share on other sites
simple_man 0 Posted January 22, 2011 Report Share Posted January 22, 2011 R32 MKV, STAGE III by C2. Elect. Boost ControllerCeramic coated exhaust many/turbo/down pipeDone 85,000km, 5000k on the kit in 3 months, +30c weather.Dyno is conservative, sorry no baseline, but you get 9PSI run as well, gives you an idea. Link to post Share on other sites
leespiro 9 Posted May 20, 2011 Report Share Posted May 20, 2011 ok guys here my setup and powerGolf Mk 3 VR6 1995 ODB1DOR 268 camsMiltek Exhaust with Decat Standard ManifoldUniversal Air FilterMaximum power speed 6066rpm (127.2)Power at flywheel 212.0 bhpPower at wheels 167.7bhpPowerloss 43.6 bhpMaximum torque speed 5160rpm (108.2 in gear usedMaximum engine torque 195.7lb ft Link to post Share on other sites
coxy2011 0 Posted December 18, 2011 Report Share Posted December 18, 2011 1997 golf vr6 obd2Bmc filter Stainless system175.1 bhp Link to post Share on other sites
levD 0 Posted February 19, 2012 Report Share Posted February 19, 2012 201 bhp 210 lb ft Link to post Share on other sites
ssaunders 199 Posted March 22, 2012 Report Share Posted March 22, 2012 Power at flywheel (corrected) 203.6 BhpPower at wheels 172.6Max torque speed 4370 rpmmax engine torque 195lb ft2.8 VR6 ODB2clocked 117K on wayMK3 GolfModded airbox with piper cross panekl filterschimmel performance 263'scustom (pipecraft) cat back 2.5 stainlessiffy sensor on RR caused jagged lines on plotshttp://i1079.photobucket.com/albums/w508/ssaunders71/statscomp.jpghttp://i1079.photobucket.com/albums/w508/ssaunders71/bhp.jpghttp://i1079.photobucket.com/albums/w508/ssaunders71/torque.jpg Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts