Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I want the wheels as far in as possible. (tuck) if that is possible on the MkIII with 8 and 9's.

Ive been tipped that Et25 up front and 15 rear would be good? Any comments on this?

My wheels are high ET, so no issues, just need to decide the size of the adapters :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Those would be too low for tuck.

Run those offsets if you want flush up front and poke out back.

Running tuck you want the adpators to be small so to keep the ET numbers high.

But to tuck 9s.... not to sure with standard arches. Could get them flush though

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems a waste to tuck 9's under the rears' date=' will look good flush, its all going to depend on tyre size choice as well!?!

[/quote']

Well, tiresize is one of the things Im asking about here....................

Ive been recommended 195/40 and 215/35.......

Poke it OUT OF THE QUESTION as it looks silly. (in my opinion) I could live with flush, I suppose.

I suppose its a bit limited with the 9'' width, as the wheels houses are not the biggest in the universe.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tyre stretch varys from different manufactures. You can have the same profile but the stretch on a falken will look different to a stretch of something like a Hankook. Then if your being picky, different model of th e same brand stretch different. The falken 512 stretches better the 912, which stretches better than the 452.

Im a fan of stretch. Not keen on chunky looking tyres.

195/40 on a 9 (conti tyre)

9_195_40_R16_Continental_Sport_Contact_2%20%282%29.jpg

205/40 on a 9 (falken tyre)

9_205_40_R16_Falken_912.jpg

215/35 on a 9 (dunlop tyre)

9_215_35_R17_Dunlop_SP9000_2.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites
×
×
  • Create New...