fernando 0 Posted July 13, 2010 Report Share Posted July 13, 2010 hi guyswas just wondering if any 1 cud help, i was interested in buying a vr6 syncro but iv noticed they are hard to come by, so i wanted to knw if i could convert ur normal 2.8 vr into 2.9 vr. Nw i nt tlaking about the syncro system itself just the engine, coz to my understanding the 2.9 lumb has a good bit more power.. so could i convert?? i know i cud increase the bore to 2.9 but what about the head i believe they have slightly different heads.. would the 2.9 fit the 2.8 block?? so basically in summary can i make a normal 2.8 lump the same as the 2.9 syncro lump with all the extra lil bells and whistles?? thanks Link to post Share on other sites
legvw 0 Posted July 14, 2010 Report Share Posted July 14, 2010 Its far easier and cheaper to buy a 2.9 engine and use that, rather than boring, new pistons, etc (they both use the same head), inlet manifold and t/b slightly different, ecu i think are slightly different. Link to post Share on other sites
matty.vrt 120 Posted July 14, 2010 Report Share Posted July 14, 2010 2.9 has slightly larger valves Link to post Share on other sites
fernando 0 Posted July 14, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 14, 2010 hmmmm ok.. yeah i have been reading up on wikipedia (very informative by the way lol) any ways wiki says The 2.9 version had a free flowing 6 centimetres catalytic converter, sharper camshafts, 4 bars (58 psi) fuel pressure regulator, enlarged inlet manifold, and larger throttle body, and when i saw that i thawt that would be fairly easy enuf to put on the 2.8, the most work would be rebore n pistons. In your opinion would u just stick with the 2.8 lump and tinker around with that or go for the 2.9 lump, u see iv got it stuck in my head that watever i do to the 2.8 lump, if i did it to the 2.9 it would always have more power... i think from standard the 2.9 is about 20hp stronger... and another more important thing, is the 2.9 as reliable as the 2.8? Link to post Share on other sites
squid1 0 Posted July 14, 2010 Report Share Posted July 14, 2010 stick with the 2.8 play with her not really worth the hassle of changing the engine n ecu for 20hp, and if urs is not an obd1 ull will ave to cahnge the loom! if u was think about chaging the interanls go for f/i mate Link to post Share on other sites
fernando 0 Posted July 14, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 14, 2010 hi squid1, thanks for that.. il do that. when u say internals, do u mean like pistons crank conrods?? oh and another thing i was just reading bout obd1 n obd2 on a thread.. which would u say is better? and is obd 1 the one with a distributor, and obd2 the one with coilpack? or is that something completely different? i knw this might sound dumb but what is f/i ?? thanks Link to post Share on other sites
vr6stormt 0 Posted July 14, 2010 Report Share Posted July 14, 2010 f/i is forced induction and internals is what you have said and obd1 and 2 differences are the obd2 is more of a modern engine Link to post Share on other sites
fernando 0 Posted July 14, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 14, 2010 ok dat makes sense... wot wud u go for obd1 or 2? Link to post Share on other sites
vr6stormt 0 Posted July 14, 2010 Report Share Posted July 14, 2010 i got a 2 and would go for another one Link to post Share on other sites
jimmyb 2 Posted July 14, 2010 Report Share Posted July 14, 2010 later obd1s have coilpacks too. Link to post Share on other sites
squid1 0 Posted July 14, 2010 Report Share Posted July 14, 2010 i have an obd2 just a little more power an as vr6stormt said its more morden Link to post Share on other sites
CALICO 130 Posted July 14, 2010 Report Share Posted July 14, 2010 easier to tune the obd2 Link to post Share on other sites
fernando 0 Posted July 14, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 14, 2010 thanks alot guys that clarifies a good few things i wondered about.. cheers guys Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts