RIX 0 Posted February 17, 2006 Report Share Posted February 17, 2006 hi dont know if its the right forum,but here goesdoes any of you have some r&r print outs of before and after fitting a schrick manifold that you would like too share.i have been a little smitten .thanx in advance. Link to post Share on other sites
Eat this 2 Posted February 17, 2006 Report Share Posted February 17, 2006 huge increae in torque 3-4krpm mine gained 80 lb ft!! it made 235 lb ft at 3500 rpm Link to post Share on other sites
petervr6 0 Posted February 17, 2006 Report Share Posted February 17, 2006 does the schrick use more fuel? Link to post Share on other sites
Eat this 2 Posted February 17, 2006 Report Share Posted February 17, 2006 it shoves more air in so your ecu SHOULD put more fuel in but its not a huge amount more Link to post Share on other sites
RIX 0 Posted February 18, 2006 Author Report Share Posted February 18, 2006 have you got the plot eat this,the superchargede cars dont have more touque the you then.what else have you done too the car too get this power.arent there any others that have before and after plots Link to post Share on other sites
RIX 0 Posted February 22, 2006 Author Report Share Posted February 22, 2006 i know from the group buy tread that ther is around 30 people that bought the manifold,so there must be a couple more that can shere there experience. Link to post Share on other sites
matth76 1 Posted February 23, 2006 Report Share Posted February 23, 2006 I'd be interested to see what gains these provide on a rolling road too. Link to post Share on other sites
dubloke 4 Posted February 23, 2006 Report Share Posted February 23, 2006 i'll see if i can dig mine out! Link to post Share on other sites
mk3anni 0 Posted February 24, 2006 Report Share Posted February 24, 2006 huge increae in torque 3-4krpm mine gained 80 lb ft!! it made 235 lb ft at 3500 rpmWhere did you get those figures John???Stealth????I'm more than happy to be proved wrong but I don't belive for a moment that you got 235lb/ft from just the inlet. Mintys car put down 230lb ft with a charger and cams. Link to post Share on other sites
mk3anni 0 Posted February 24, 2006 Report Share Posted February 24, 2006 it shoves more air in so your ecu SHOULD put more fuel in but its not a huge amount moreIf that was the case you wouldn't need a remap. If you get a schrick allow for a session on the rollers to get the car mapped to suit, otherwise it will storm to about 4k, then pull back and fell flat at the top end.My MPG went down cos I drive like an arse, but because you change the way you drive you should actually save fuel. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts