petervr6 0 Posted April 17, 2006 Report Share Posted April 17, 2006 . http://videos.streetfire.net/category/VW/0/D53B1687-D449-4908-9650-6B781E71912E.htm Link to post Share on other sites
wayne_1@tiscali.co.uk 27 Posted April 17, 2006 Report Share Posted April 17, 2006 cool just proves m3s arent that fast Link to post Share on other sites
ian 182 0 Posted April 17, 2006 Report Share Posted April 17, 2006 nice launchian Link to post Share on other sites
Earwig 89 Posted April 17, 2006 Report Share Posted April 17, 2006 If I remember this car belongs to a guy who was saying hi in the hello thread. :-)VR6 Kompressor I believe.Mark. Link to post Share on other sites
RIX 0 Posted April 17, 2006 Report Share Posted April 17, 2006 http://videos.streetfire.net/category/VW/0/7B6ABEBF-33C3-4C1D-8D6F-508B415485AB.htmhere is something for kev he he the name says it all verhoven tuning Link to post Share on other sites
mike 6 Posted April 17, 2006 Report Share Posted April 17, 2006 sweet, so its charged right? Link to post Share on other sites
Zonda_ 0 Posted April 17, 2006 Report Share Posted April 17, 2006 Well there's no way it could match any M3 in standard trim. Link to post Share on other sites
vr6matt 0 Posted April 18, 2006 Report Share Posted April 18, 2006 Thats what I was thinking... Must be charged, most M3's are low 5's to sixty. Link to post Share on other sites
Earwig 89 Posted April 18, 2006 Report Share Posted April 18, 2006 Yes it is charged. :-) Link to post Share on other sites
Ciaran 4 Posted April 19, 2006 Report Share Posted April 19, 2006 i made an attempt to race an M3 yesterday though i was doing but he must have been messing and then he took of an dissapeared into the distance they are serious quick mid range Link to post Share on other sites
petervr6 0 Posted April 19, 2006 Author Report Share Posted April 19, 2006 thought so as well. Link to post Share on other sites
silverline 0 Posted April 22, 2006 Report Share Posted April 22, 2006 that cant be a proper M3, or that vr6 is seriously tuned! an m3 would leave a vr standing, even a charged 1. could be a 328 which is why a charged vr pulled away Link to post Share on other sites
petervr6 0 Posted April 22, 2006 Author Report Share Posted April 22, 2006 new shape m3 spec bit quicler than the E36 but cant find the E36 on there http://www.parkers.co.uk/choosing/specs/data.aspx?model_id=1154&id=20157 now standard vr6 spec http://www.parkers.co.uk/choosing/specs/data.aspx?model_id=1015&id=10317 and the 1 in the vid is supered i think the super vr6 would beat it. Link to post Share on other sites
mk3anni 0 Posted April 22, 2006 Report Share Posted April 22, 2006 that cant be a proper M3' date=' or that vr6 is seriously tuned! an m3 would leave a vr standing, even a charged 1. could be a 328 which is why a charged vr pulled away[/quote']So am I right to think your implying that a 328 can beat a stock VR???Don't be silly!!! Link to post Share on other sites
sparkz 0 Posted April 22, 2006 Report Share Posted April 22, 2006 that cant be a proper M3' date=' or that vr6 is seriously tuned! an m3 would leave a vr standing, even a charged 1. could be a 328 which is why a charged vr pulled away[/quote']So am I right to think your implying that a 328 can beat a stock VR???Don't be silly!!!Bmw's weigh a tonne!!! Ive taken the piss out of 328, m3 e36 and even the new m3 e46 in my vr. Its all about power to weight ratio as well!! Link to post Share on other sites
Zonda_ 0 Posted April 22, 2006 Report Share Posted April 22, 2006 They may well weigh a ton but if anyone seriously believes that a 174bhp VR6 can outgun a 338bhp M3 then they need help. I've driven on track against an E30 Me an my VR was no match for it. Link to post Share on other sites
Eat this 2 Posted April 23, 2006 Report Share Posted April 23, 2006 i doubt any1 here is daft enough to believe a stock vr will get anywhere close to an m3 even the 3l version a charged vr would have somewhere near similer power to weight though meaning at lowish speeds itl keep the m3 honest Link to post Share on other sites
Russ_vr6 12 Posted April 23, 2006 Report Share Posted April 23, 2006 like most things mate its swings ad round abouts,get a bad driver or 1 who doesnt know the car and most things can beat 'faster' cars.also bear in mind when the m3 and golf performance figures were taken it was done my bm with a test driver with no fuel,no extras like a big spoiler,mud flaps,wider wheels etc,which can make the difference,also if u cant launch a rwd car properly u can lose over a sec,which up to say 70 would mean a lightly tuned vr wouldnt be far off Link to post Share on other sites
goonersteve 0 Posted April 23, 2006 Report Share Posted April 23, 2006 Interesting stuff guys. Some points which i wouldn't really have considered normally :? Link to post Share on other sites
petervr6 0 Posted April 24, 2006 Author Report Share Posted April 24, 2006 but that vr aint stock so power to weight 300bhp vr i would say the vr would beat the m3 rear wheel/front wheel. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts