Radodb
-
Content Count
97 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
VR6OC News
Website Content
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Gallery
Store
Collections
Community Map
Everything posted by Radodb
-
What's everyone's views on compression 8:5:1 or 9:1 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
But I could buy a quick spool valve and use a log like the supra boys. Can get them cheaper http://www.ebay.com/itm/T4-Twin-Scroll-Quick-Spool-Valve-QSV-Fully-Open-10-PSI-Cheap-Easy-Horse-Power-/271339004587?pt=Motors_Car_Truck_Parts_Accessories&hash=item3f2d10a2ab&vxp=mtr Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Yup this is my dilemma. So iv got to build this manifold OR go log and use my t4 divided with it and lose the gains Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Unless I run the T4 divided with a log manifold and lose the gain of the divided housing Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
They don't do a T4.82 that's undivided iv got the T4 .82 divided now Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
I don't no what difference is between the two but from what iv read they both basically work out the same Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Yeah I think that's what I'll do, trying to get hold of a T3 ar.84 or t4 .68 to use for the time being Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Iv dropped them an email but I'm starting to think iv email the US lads haha Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
700 fwd on the road would be fun lol Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Defiantly need AWD or crazy slicks Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
the manifold iv linked would be amazing on your setup..!
-
http://jdlautodesign.net/shop/vw-vr6-12v-top-mount/ i would love that manifold!!
-
hmm yeah could be I'm not sure what power people are running through them, I'm sure iv read somewhere 550 is almost maxing them out but could of made that up in my head haha
-
thats my problem i don't won't the cost that comes with them.. don't worry man its fine
-
surly with such a large turbo you would be best with a fully tubular manifold to see the gains?
-
Iv not a clue dude Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
iv decided to keep my twin scroll and build this manifold with two blowoffs. dose anyone no what size tubing ill need ( what size is the standard manifold piping in that section of the standard exhaust ) 2012-08-08 21.17.10 by daniel.daniel371, on Flickr 2012-08-06 22.58.34 by daniel.daniel371, on Flickr 2012-08-06 22.31.27 by daniel.daniel371, on Flickr
-
Will it hold up all the way to the top? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
I'm looking at keeping ner standard rev limiter so would like it fairly soon but hold the power up to the top
-
i retract my last post haha.. are you currently undivided
-
if it turns out they do a T4 undivided in .81 or .96 would the .81 be the best one to go for?
-
but then looking on a US page iv found this Specs are as follows: T3 .63 or .82 A/R V-Band (4-bolt or 5-bolt available, please specify upon ordering) OR T4 .68 .81 or .96 AR rear housing V-Band (clamps + flanges are an addtional cost, please inquire with us for a full kit) OR Full V-Band Inlet/Outlet either .64 A/R or .82 A/R (clamps + flanges are an addtional cost, please inquire with us for a full kit) Compressor Wheel: Inducer 2.44" (62mm) Turbine Wheel: Exducer 2.437" (62mm) Ported S-compressor cover (.70ar) Capable of 700+ hp
-
no LSD as yet I'm just building the engine up currently but it will be fitted and both put into the car at the same time. Apparently not unless i go divided and iv already got that housing Turbine housing options: - T3 .63 or .82 A/R with 4 bolt (2.5") discharge - T3 .63 A/R with 5 bolt discharge (with or without wastegate hole) - T3 .63 or .82 A/R with 3" V-Band discharge - V-Band inlet .64 or .82 A/R with V-Band discharge - T4 Tangential .58 or .68 A/R with 3 5/8" V-Band discharge - T4 Divided .84 A/R with 3 5/8" V-Band discharge - Mitsubishi .63 A/R - Buick .63 A/R
-
yeah they are both open just unsure on what would be the best to go for
-
i think its between a T3 .82 or T4 .68 OR just the T4 divided iv got and run that with an undivided manifold??